🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in other EU countries